Mortality of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients in an Argentinean population: A study from the RelevarEM registry.

We aimed to evaluate mortality and causes of death among Argentinean neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and identify predictors of death. Retrospective study included 158 NMOSD patients and 11 (7%) patients died after 11 years of follow-up for a total exposure time of 53,345 days with an overall incidence density of 2.06 × 10.000 patients/day (95% CI 1.75-2.68). Extensive cervical myelitis with respiratory failure (45%) was the most frequent cause of death. Older age (HR = 2.05, p = 0.002) and higher disability score (HR = 2.30, p < 0.001) at disease onset were independent predictors of death. We found an 11-year mortality rate of 7% in Argentinean NMOSD patients.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with optic neuritis related to NMOSD and MOGAD in distinct ethnic groups from Latin America.

BACKGROUND: Optic neuritis (ON) can be an initial manifestation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) associated with aquaporin 4-antibody (AQP4-Ab) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab)-associated disease (MOGAD). Additionally, both diseases may have overlapping paraclinical and radiological features. These diseases may have different outcomes and prognoses. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and prognostic features of patients with NMOSD and MOGAD presenting ON as first attack, from different ethnic groups in Latin America. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study in patients from Argentina (n = 61), Chile (n = 18), Ecuador (n = 27), Brazil (n = 30), Venezuela (n = 10) and Mexico (n = 49) with MOGAD or NMOSD related ON. Predictors of disability outcomes at last follow-up, namely visual disability (Visual Functional System Score ≥4), motor disability (permanent inability to walk further than 100 m unaided) and wheelchair dependence based on EDSS score were evaluated. RESULTS: After a mean disease duration of 42.7 (±40.2) months in NMOSD and 19.7 (±23.6) in MOGAD, 55% and 22% (p>0.001) experienced permanent severe visual disability (visual acuity from 20/100 to 20/200), 22% and 6% (p = 0.01) permanent motor disability and 11% and 0% (p = 0.04) had become wheelchair dependent, respectively. Older age at disease onset was a predictor of severe visual disability (OR=1,03 CI95%1.01-1.05, p = 0.03); older age at disease onset (OR=1,04 CI95%1.01-1.07, p = 0.01), higher number of relapses (OR=1,32 CI95%1.02-1.71, p = 0.03) and rituximab treatment (OR=0,36 CI95%0.14-0.90, p = 0.02) were predictors of permanent motor disability, whereas ON associated with myelitis at disease onset was a predictor of wheelchair dependency (OR=4,16, CI95%1.23-14.08, p = 0,02) in NMOSD patients. No differences were found when evaluating distinct ethnic groups (Mixed vs. Caucasian vs. Afro-descendant) CONCLUSIONS: NMOSD was associated with poorer clinical outcomes than MOGAD. Ethnicity was not associated with prognostic factors. Distinct predictors of permanent visual and motor disability and wheelchair dependency in NMOSD patients were found.

Therapeutic strategies in NMOSD and MOGAD patients: A multicenter cohort study in Latin America.

PURPOSE: This study describes the therapeutic strategies in NMOSD and MOGAD adopted by neurologists to treat both conditions in Latin America (LATAM) with main focus on rituximab (RTX) and the disease outcome. METHODS: retrospective study in a cohort of NMOSD and MOGAD patients followed in specialized MS/NMOSD centers from eight countries and 14 LATAM reference centers. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected. RTX strategies on naïve (for rituximab) patients were summarized as follows: scheme A: two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart and repeated every 6 months; scheme B: four 375 mg/m2 infusions every week for 4 weeks and repeated every 6 months; scheme C: one 1000 mg infusions and repeated every 6 months; scheme D: other scheme used. Relapse rate and adverse events during follow-up were analyzed considering the different RTX schemes. Poisson and logistic regression analysis were used to assess baseline aspects and disease activity during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were included. 197 were NMOSD patients (164, 83.2% AQP4-IgG seropositive and 16.7% seronegative) and 20 were MOGAD patients. The most frequent long-term treatment was RTX in both groups (48.2% and 65% for NMOSD and MOGAD patients, respectively). The most common RTX regimen used in 79 (83.1%) patients was two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart and repeat every 6 months. Relapses under RTX treatment were observed in 21 (22.1%) patients. Relapses after RTX treatment were associated with higher EDSS (OR 1.75, 95%CI 1.44-2.34, p = 0.03) and higher ARR pre-RTX (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.72-3.12, p = 0.002) but not with RTX regimen (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.89-1.21, p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: the most strategy used in LATAM was RTX with two 1000 mg infusions 15 days apart. Relapses during follow up were not associated with RTX regimen used.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with and without associated autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determinate the frequency of this association and compare the features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with and without associated autoimmune diseases (AD) in a Latin American (LATAM) population in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NMOSD according to the 2015 diagnostic criteria. Patients from Argentina (n=77), Brazil (n=46), and Venezuela (n=17) were enrolled and classified into two groups as follows: with AD or without AD. Clinical, paraclinical (including aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-ab) status), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prognosis data were analyzed and compared. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and the Nelson-Aalen estimator analyses were performed to estimate both time and the cumulative hazard risk of disability reaching an EDSS≥4; and time for the first recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 140 patients, 33 (23.5%) patients had associated an AD at presentation. The most frequent associated AD was Hashimoto disease (n=10) followed by lupus (n=7) and Sjogren's syndrome (n=6). However, rituximab use (42.4% vs. 21.5%, p=0.02), female gender (82.2% vs. 100%, p=0.006), corticospinal lesions on MRI (0% vs. 12.5%, p=0.01) at onset, and positivity for antinuclear antibodies (21.2% vs. 48.4%, p=0.03) were significantly associated with NMOSD patients with AD in comparison to NMOSD patients without AD. No differences were found in other clinical and paraclinical aspects between groups. KM and Nelson-Aalen estimator analyses did not show differences between groups. CONCLUSION: NMOSD patients associated with AD were observed in 23.5%. In addition, NMOSD patients with and without associated AD were similar in most evaluated features.

Disability outcomes in NMOSD and MOGAD patients: data from a nationwide registry in Argentina.

The objective was to evaluate time to reach an EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 in NMOSD and MOGAD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT 03,375,177). METHODS: NMOSD patients diagnosed according to 2015 criteria and with MOGAD were identified. Patients with at least 3 years of follow-up and periodic clinical evaluations with EDSS outcomes were included. AQP4-antibody and MOG-antibody status was recorded, and patients were stratified as seropositive and seronegative for AQP4-antibody. EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 were defined as dependent variables. Log rank test was used to identify differences between groups. RESULTS: Registry data was provided for a total of 137 patients. Of these, seventy-five presented AQP4-ab-positive NMOSD, 45 AQP4-ab-negative NMOSD, and 11 MOGAD. AQP4-ab status was determined by cell-based assay (CBA) in 72% of NMOSD patients. MOG-ab status was tested by CBA in all cases. Mean time to EDSS of 4 was 53.6 ± 24.5 vs. 63.1 ± 32.2 vs. 44.7 ± 32 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD, respectively (p = 0.76). Mean time to EDSS of 6 was 79.2 ± 44.3 vs. 75.7 ± 48.6 vs. 54.7 ± 50 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.23), while mean time to EDSS of 7 was 86.8 ± 54 vs. 80.4 ± 51 vs. 58.5 ± 47 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: No differences were observed between NMOSD (seropositive and seronegative) and MOGAD in survival curves.

Neuropatía motora multifocal: ¿cómo diagnosticar un caballo de Troya? / Multifocal motor neuropathy: how to diagnose a trojan horse?

Introducción: La neuropatía motora multifocal con bloqueos de la conducción (NMMBC) es una enfermedad crónica inmunomediada, con un compromiso exclusivo de los nervios motores. Es importante diferenciarla de otras enfermedades que cursan con afectación motora, debido a que ésta es una enfermedad tratable. Cuadro clínico: Paciente varón de 56 años, con compromiso motor progresivo en el miembro superior del lado derecho desde el año 2016. El examen neurofisiológico demostró la presencia de múltiples bloqueos de la conducción nerviosa. Los anticuerpos antigangliósidos fueron negativos. Se indicó tratamiento con inmunoglobulina endovenosa en varios ciclos, con mejoría progresiva del cuadro. Discusión: Se discute el plan diagnóstico clínico y electrofisiológico, los diagnósticos diferenciales, las hipótesis fisiopatológicas y el tratamiento de esta enfermedad de rara ocurrencia

Introduction: Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction blocks (NMMBC) is a chronic immunemediated disease that exclusively involves the motor nerves. It is important to differentiate it from other diseases that present with motor involvement, because this is a treatable disease. Clinical picture: A 56-year-old male patient, with progressive motor involvement in the right upper limb since 2016. A neurophysiological examination revealed multiple nerve conduction blocks. Antiganglioside antibodies were negative. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin was indicated for several cycles with progressive improvement of the condition. Discussion: Clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic plans, differential diagnoses, pathophysiological hypotheses, and treatment of this rare disease are discussed

Effectiveness and Safety of Early High-Efficacy Versus Escalation Therapy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: Escalation (ES) and early high-efficacy (EHE) therapies have been the main treatment strategies adopted in multiple sclerosis (MS) in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of EHE versus ES strategies in MS patients from Argentina. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Argentina. Eligible patients were categorized into 2 groups as follows: EHE if received natalizumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, or cladribine; and ES if received interferon ß, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, or fingolimod as initial therapy. The primary outcome was confirmed disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] increase). Additional outcomes included the proportion of patients and time to: EDSS 6; new relapses; new T2-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions; no evidence of disease activity; and specific adverse events. Propensity score-based nearest-neighbor matching (without replacement) was applied to homogenize the sample, and Cox regression model stratified by matched pairs was used for the analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 193 and 112 patients were retained in the ES and EHE groups, respectively. The EHE significantly decreased the risk of EDSS progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.40-0.98; P = 0.04), relapses (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = 0.006), and new MRI activity during follow-up (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in specific adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that EHE therapies prevent disease progression, relapses, and new MRI lesions and demonstrated no increased risk of specific adverse events when compared with ES therapy. These data should be considered when selecting a specific treatment for MS patients.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio differs between MS and NMOSD at disease onset and predict disability.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) for differentiating multiple sclerosis (MS) from aquaporin-4-antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) at disease onset. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled and reviewed the medical records of patients with MS (N = 50) and NMOSD (N = 33) followed in specialized MS/NMOSD centers from Argentina. Demographical and clinical (manifestation and disability) data and neuroradiological features (new/enlarging or contrast-enhancing lesions) were assessed at baseline, 1 and 2 years. Serum samples were obtained during the first relapse without a previous acute or chronic treatment, at 1 and 2 years. Mixed-effects model was used to identify independent associations between the log-transformed NLR or PLR and MS/NMOSD outcomes. RESULTS: PLR is increased in NMOSD when compared to MS (229.4 ± 86.74 vs. 186.6 ± 70.17, P = 0.01), but no significant differences were found for NLR (3.51 ± 1.29 vs. 3.30 ± 1.17, P = 0.43). PLR was the only independent predictor of poor physical disability score (EDSS ≥ 4) in NMOSD patients at 2 years (ß=0.28, p = 0.02) after applying multivariate mixed-effects regression analysis. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the PLR was the only independent predictor of EDSS ≥ 4 at 2 years (OR 28.8, p = 0.041) in the NMOSD group. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.841. CONCLUSION: PLR could be potentially useful as additional diagnostic tool in differentiating these two neuroinflammatory conditions at presentation. PLR can predict severity of neurological disability at 2 years in NMOSD patients.

Seasonal variation in attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis: Evaluation of 794 attacks from a nationwide registry in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: Identification of triggers that potentially instigate attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) has remained challenging. We aimed to analyze the seasonality of NMOSD and MS attacks in an Argentinean cohort seeking differences between the two disorders. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of NMOSD and MS patients followed in specialized centers from Argentina and enrolled in RelevarEM, a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS/NMOSD patients. Patients with complete relapse data (date, month and year) at onset and during follow-up were included. Attack counts were analyzed by month using a Poisson regression model with the median monthly attack count used as reference. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients (431 MS and 120 NMOSD), experiencing 236 NMOSD-related attacks and 558 MS-related attacks were enrolled. The mean age at disease onset in NMOSD was 39.5 ± 5.8 vs. 31.2 ± 9.6 years in MS (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 6.1 ± 3.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.4 years (p < 0.01), respectively. Most of the included patients were female in both groups (79% vs. 60%, p < 0.01). We found a peak of number of attacks in June (NMOSD: 28 attacks (11.8%) vs MS: 33 attacks (5.9%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.15-2.12, p = 0.03), but no differences were found across the months in both disorders when evaluated separately. Strikingly, we observed a significant difference in the incidence rate ratio of attacks during the winter season when comparing NMOSD vs. MS (NMOSD: 75 attacks (31.7%) vs MS: 96 attacks (17.2%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.21-2.01, p = 0.02) after applying Poisson regression model. Similar results were observed when comparing the seropositive NMOSD (n = 75) subgroup vs. MS. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of seasonal variation in MS and NMOSD attacks was observed when evaluated separately. Future epidemiological studies about the effect of different environmental factors on MS and NMOSD attacks should be evaluated prospectively in Latin America population.

Chiasmatic lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging during the first event of optic neuritis in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease in a Latin American cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optic neuritis (ON) is often the initial symptom of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease (MOGAD). We aimed to compare the frequency and pattern of chiasmatic lesions in MOGAD-related ON (MOGAD-ON) and NMOSD-related ON (NMOSD-ON) using conventional brain imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) in Latin America (LATAM). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and brain MRI (≤30 days from ON onset) of patients with a first event of MOGAD-ON and NMOSD-ON. Patients from Argentina (n = 72), Chile (n = 21), Ecuador (n = 31), Brazil (n = 30), Venezuela (n = 10) and Mexico (n = 82) were included. Antibody status was tested using a cell-based assay. Demographic, clinical, imaging and prognostic (as measured by the Visual Functional System Score [VFSS] of the Expanded Disability Status Scale) data were compared. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients (208 NMOSD and 38 MOGAD) were included. No differences were found in gender and ethnicity between the groups. We observed chiasmatic lesions in 66/208 (31.7%) NMOSD-ON and in 5/38 (13.1%) MOGAD-ON patients (p = 0.01). Of these patients with chiasmatic lesions, 54/66 (81.8%) and 4/5 had associated longitudinally extensive optic nerve lesions, 45/66 (68%) and 4/5 had bilateral lesions, and 31/66 (47%) and 4/5 showed gadolinium-enhancing chiasmatic lesions, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between VFSS and presence of bilateral (r = 0,28, p < 0.0001), chiasmatic (r = 0.27, p = 0.0001) and longitudinally extensive lesions (r = 0,25, p = 0.0009) in the NMOSD-ON group, but no correlations were observed in the MOGAD-ON group. CONCLUSIONS: Chiasmatic lesions were significantly more common in NMOSD than in MOGAD during an ON attack in this LATAM cohort. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these results.

Assessing attacks and treatment response rates among adult patients with NMOSD and MOGAD: Data from a nationwide registry in Argentina.

We aimed to examine treatment interventions implemented in patients experiencing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) attacks (frequency, types, and response). METHODS: Retrospective study. Data on patient demographic, clinical and radiological findings, and administered treatments were collected. Remission status (complete [CR], partial [PR], no remission [NR]), based on changes in the EDSS score was evaluated before treatment, during attack, and at 6 months. CR was analyzed with a generalized estimating equations (GEEs) model. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients (120 NMOSD and 11 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated diseases [MOGAD]), experiencing 262 NMOSD-related attacks and receiving 270 treatments were included. High-dose steroids (81.4%) was the most frequent treatment followed by plasmapheresis (15.5%). CR from attacks was observed in 47% (105/223) of all treated patients. During the first attack, we observed CR:71.2%, PR:16.3% and NR:12.5% after the first course of treatment. For second, third, fourth, and fifth attacks, CR was observed in 31.1%, 10.7%, 27.3%, and 33.3%, respectively. Remission rates were higher for optic neuritis vs. myelitis (p < 0.001). Predictor of CR in multivariate GEE analysis was age in both NMOSD (OR = 2.27, p = 0.002) and MOGAD (OR = 1.53, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests individualization of treatment according to age and attack manifestation. The outcome of attacks was generally poor.

Aggressive multiple sclerosis in Argentina: Data from the nationwide registry RelevarEM.

The objectives of the present study were to describe the frequency of aggressive multiple sclerosis (aMS) as well as to compare clinical and radiological characteristics in aMS and non-aMS patients included in RelevarEM (NCT03375177). METHODS: The eligible study population and cohort selection included adult-onset patients (≥18 years) with definite MS. AMS were defined as those reaching confirmed EDSS ≥ 6 within 5 years from symptom onset. Confirmation was achieved when a subsequent EDSS ≥ 6 was recorded at least six months later but within 5 years of the first clinical presentation. AMS and non-aMS were compared using the χ2 test for categorical and the Mann-Whitney for continuous variables at MS onset and multivariable analysis was performed using forward stepwise logistic regression with baseline characteristics at disease onset. RESULTS: A total of 2158 patients with MS were included: 74 aMS and 2084 non-aMS. The prevalence of aMS in our cohort was 3.4% (95%CI 2.7-4.2). AMS were more likely to be male (p = 0.003), older at MS onset (p < 0.001), have primary progressive MS (PPMS) phenotype (p = 0.03), multifocal presentation (p < 0.001), and spinal cord as well as infratentorial lesions at MRI during disease onset (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: 3.4% of our patient population could be considered aMS. Men, patients older at symptom onset, multifocal presentation, PPMS phenotype, and spinal cord as well as brainstem lesions on MRI at clinical presentation all had higher odds of having aMS.

Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in Argentina and Chile.

BACKGROUND: The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (PwRMS) in Argentina and Chile has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in PwRMS in Argentina and Chile, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective and observational study. We reviewed the medical records of PwRMS who had been treated with natalizumab for at least one year, without any interruption in MS treatment that lasted more than 12 weeks. We analyzed changes in annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: We enrolled 117 PwRMS treated with natalizumab. Natalizumab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in ARR from baseline after one year and two years of treatment (from 1.97 to 0.06 and 0.09 respectively; p<0.01 at each time point). From baseline, EDSS scores were reduced by 0.71 and 0.73 points at one and two years, respectively (p<0.01). No worsening of disability was observed in 82.9 and 67.5% of PwRMS at one and two years, respectively. The improvement in disability was 44.4% at one year and 39.3% at two years. During natalizumab treatment, the number of relapse-related hospitalizations was significantly reduced (p<0.01). MRI lesions (new/enlarging T2 or gadolinium-enhancing) were significantly reduced, compared with baseline. No evidence of disease activity was observed in 65% at two years of natalizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab significantly reduced disease activity in PwRMS in Argentina and Chile, in clinical practice. Natalizumab also decreased the number of hospitalizations compared with pre-natalizumab treatment.

Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America.

BACKGROUND: Despite the abundance of information concerning ocrelizumab in phase III clinical trials, there is scarce evidence regarding real-world patient profiles. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence with treatment among patients who used ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study in Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Medical record databases on patients who received ocrelizumab were analyzed. Demographic and clinical variables were described, along with effectiveness outcomes, which included the proportions of patients free from clinical relapses, from disability progression and from new or enlarging T2 or T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, on annual magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were included. The most frequent phenotype was relapsing-remitting MS, in 64.2% of the patients. The mean age at study entry was 41.3 ± 12.0 years and 51.8% were women. A total of 38% had had relapse activity during the 12 months before starting on ocrelizumab, with a mean relapse rate of 1.3 ± 0.6 during that period. 75% were free from clinical relapses and 91% were free from gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the relapsing-remitting course. Ocrelizumab discontinuation during the first 12 months was observed in three patients (3.7%). The mean persistence observed during the first-year follow-up was 338 ± 24 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is in line with previous randomized clinical trials and recent real-world studies describing patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence regarding ocrelizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America.

Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in Argentina and Chile / Efectividad en el mundo real del tratamiento con Natalizumab para pacientes con esclerosis múltiple recurrente en Argentina y Chile

ABSTRACT Background: The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (PwRMS) in Argentina and Chile has not been reported. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in PwRMS in Argentina and Chile, in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective and observational study. We reviewed the medical records of PwRMS who had been treated with natalizumab for at least one year, without any interruption in MS treatment that lasted more than 12 weeks. We analyzed changes in annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: We enrolled 117 PwRMS treated with natalizumab. Natalizumab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in ARR from baseline after one year and two years of treatment (from 1.97 to 0.06 and 0.09 respectively; p<0.01 at each time point). From baseline, EDSS scores were reduced by 0.71 and 0.73 points at one and two years, respectively (p<0.01). No worsening of disability was observed in 82.9 and 67.5% of PwRMS at one and two years, respectively. The improvement in disability was 44.4% at one year and 39.3% at two years. During natalizumab treatment, the number of relapse-related hospitalizations was significantly reduced (p<0.01). MRI lesions (new/enlarging T2 or gadolinium-enhancing) were significantly reduced, compared with baseline. No evidence of disease activity was observed in 65% at two years of natalizumab treatment. Conclusions: Natalizumab significantly reduced disease activity in PwRMS in Argentina and Chile, in clinical practice. Natalizumab also decreased the number of hospitalizations compared with pre-natalizumab treatment.

RESUMEN Antecedentes: La efectividad de Natalizumab en personas con esclerosis múltiple recurrente (PwRMS) en Argentina y Chile no se ha reportado. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento con Natalizumab en PwRMS en Argentina y Chile en la práctica clínica. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo y observacional. Revisamos los registros médicos de PwRMS que fueron tratados con Natalizumab al menos 1 año, sin interrupción de tratamiento para EM durante más de 12 semanas. Analizamos los cambios en la tasa anualizada de recaídas (ARR), escala de discapacidad expandida (EDSS) y resonancia magnética (MRI). Resultados: Se incluyeron 117 PwRMS. El tratamiento con Natalizumab se asoció con una reducción significativa de la tasa anualizada de recaídas (ARR) cada 1 y 2 años (de 1.97 a 0.06 y 0.09, respectivamente; p<0.01 en ambos casos). El EDSS se redujo 0,71 y 0,73 puntos al año 1 y 2, respectivamente (p<0,01). No se observó empeoramiento del EDSS en 82,9 y 67,5% de los PwRMS al año 1 y 2, respectivamente. La mejoría del EDSS fue 44,4 y 39,3% al año 1 y 2, respectivamente. El número de hospitalizaciones se redujo significativamente (p<0,01). Las lesiones en MRI (nuevas/agrandadas en T2 o con realce con gadolinio) se redujeron significativamente en comparación con el valor basal. No se observó evidencia de actividad de la enfermedad en el 65% de los PwRMS a 2 los años. Conclusiones: Natalizumab redujo significativamente la actividad de la enfermedad en PwRMS de Argentina y Chile en la práctica clínica. Además, disminuyó el número de hospitalizaciones comparado con el tratamiento previo.

Employment status in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis from Argentina: Impact of disability and neuropsychological factors.

BACKGROUND: Unemployment is common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and might be prevented if factors associated with work loss are identified. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on employment status in a cohort of PwMS from Argentina and to evaluate their association with anxiety, depression, fatigue and disability. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess employment in PwMS using an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire, which also included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale and Expanded Disability Status Scale. The data was compared between employed (full-time vs. part-time) vs. unemployed (looking for vs. not looking for work) PwMS. Univariate and multivariate models were designed to identify factors independently associated with unemployment. RESULTS: Among the 167 PwMS, 120 (71.6%, full-time = 65%) were employed, and 47 (28.4%, looking for work = 27.6%) were currently unemployed. Age, gender, and duration of disease were similar in both groups. Univariate analysis showed that anxiety, depression, fatigue and disability were significantly associated with unemployed PwMS. However, only disability (OR = 1.36 (1.08-1.70), p = 0.007) was independently associated with unemployment after applying multivariate analysis (logistic regression). CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of PwMS from this sample in Argentina were unemployed. Neuropsychological factors and disability were associated with unemployment status.

Use of cannabis in patients with multiple sclerosis from Argentina.

BACKGROUND: The use of cannabis to treat some symptoms of neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), has increased worldwide. We aimed to assess the use of cannabis in patients with MS (PwMS) from Argentina, its reasons and patients' perceptions on the management of MS symptoms. Additionally, we assessed their association with socio-demographic and clinical aspects. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey that included 281 PwMS from Argentina was conducted. Screening instruments: Demographics and clinical data, health-related QoL (MS Impact Scale-29), Fatigue Severity Scale, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sleep disorders, physical disability (self-administrated Expanded Disability Status Scale) and medical or recreational cannabis use were evaluated. A logistic regression model was carried out. RESULTS: Current users (cannabis was used within the past year) was reported in 34.2% and former users (had tried cannabis but not used it within the past year) in 22.7%. Daily cannabis use was reported in 31.3% (current + former users) of the studied cohort, 41.9% started their use after MS diagnosis and 54.3% of them had never discussed about cannabis use with their neurologist. Recreational use was reported in 47.5%. Younger (age below 30 years) PwMS (OR = 2.39, p = 0.03), presence of chronic pain (OR = 2.42, p = 0.002) and current alcohol intake (OR = 3.33, p = 0.001) were predictors of current cannabis use in our multivariate model. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of use of cannabis in PwMS from Argentina was observed. Demographic, symptoms and lifestyle factors predict cannabis use. Identifying the presence and severity of these conditions would contribute to a better MS management and treatment.

Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America / Experiencia en la vida real con el uso de ocrelizumab en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple en Latinoamérica

ABSTRACT Background: Despite the abundance of information concerning ocrelizumab in phase III clinical trials, there is scarce evidence regarding real-world patient profiles. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence with treatment among patients who used ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study in Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Medical record databases on patients who received ocrelizumab were analyzed. Demographic and clinical variables were described, along with effectiveness outcomes, which included the proportions of patients free from clinical relapses, from disability progression and from new or enlarging T2 or T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, on annual magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 81 patients were included. The most frequent phenotype was relapsing-remitting MS, in 64.2% of the patients. The mean age at study entry was 41.3 ± 12.0 years and 51.8% were women. A total of 38% had had relapse activity during the 12 months before starting on ocrelizumab, with a mean relapse rate of 1.3 ± 0.6 during that period. 75% were free from clinical relapses and 91% were free from gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the relapsing-remitting course. Ocrelizumab discontinuation during the first 12 months was observed in three patients (3.7%). The mean persistence observed during the first-year follow-up was 338 ± 24 days. Conclusions: Our study is in line with previous randomized clinical trials and recent real-world studies describing patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence regarding ocrelizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America.

RESUMEN Introducción: A pesar de la abundante información sobre ocrelizumab proveniente de los ensayos clínicos de fase III, todavía se tiene poca evidencia sobre la efectividad y el perfil de pacientes provenientes de la vida real. Objetivo: Evaluar el perfil clínico y demográfico, la efectividad y la persistencia al tratamiento en pacientes que usaron el ocrelizumab para el tratamiento de esclerosis múltiple (EM) en Latinoamérica. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico en Argentina, Chile y México. Se analizaron los datos de los pacientes que recibieron ocrelizumab. Se describieron las variables demográficas y clínicas, así como los resultados de efectividad que incluyeron la proporción de pacientes libres de recaídas clínicas, libres de progresión de la discapacidad, libres de nuevas lesiones en la secuencia T2 o T1 con gadolinio durante el seguimiento. Resultados: Se incluyeron 81 pacientes. El fenotipo más frecuente fue EM remitente recurrente (EMRR) en el 64,2% de los pacientes. La edad media fue de 41.3±12 años, y el 51,8% eran mujeres. Un total de 38% tuvo recaídas durante los 12 meses previos al inicio de ocrelizumab, con una tasa anualizada de recaídas media de 1.3±0.6 durante ese período. En el seguimiento a 12 meses, el 75% estuvo libre de recaídas clínicas y el 91%, libre de nuevas lesiones en RM. Tres pacientes interrumpieron el tratamiento durante el seguimiento (3,7%). La persistencia al tratamiento observada durante el primer año de seguimiento fue de 338±24 días. Conclusión: Nuestro estudio está en línea con los datos provenientes de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados previos y estudios recientes del mundo real que describen la efectividad de los perfiles de pacientes y la persistencia al tratamiento con ocrelizumab en pacientes con EM en Latinoamérica.

An Abnormally High Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Not an Independent Outcome Predictor in AQP4-IgG-Positive NMOSD.

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in many autoimmune conditions as a biomarker of inflammation and/or disease activity. The role of NLR in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is far from clear. In this study, NLR was evaluated in patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD at disease onset and its prognostic impact was subsequently assessed. Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively included all recent/newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD (n=90) from three different countries in Latin America (LATAM): Argentina, Ecuador, and Mexico. NLR was compared between AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and healthy controls (HC, n = 365). Demographic, clinical, paraclinical (including imaging), and prognostic data at 12 and 24 months were also evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was used to describe and identify independent associations between the log-transformed NLR and clinical (relapses and EDSS) and imaging (new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions) outcomes. Results: NLR was higher in NMOSD patients during the first attack compared with HC (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 0.6; p<0.0001). Regardless of immunosuppressant's initiation at disease onset, NLR remained higher in NMOSD patients at 12 (2.8 ± 1.3; p<0.0001) and 24 (3.1 ± 1.6; p<0.0001) months. No association was found at 12 and 24 months between the log-transformed NLR and the presence of relapses, new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions, and/or physical disability. Conclusions: In this cohort of LATAM patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, NLR was abnormally high in attacks but also during follow-up. However, a high NLR was not an independent predictor of clinical or imaging outcomes in our models.